SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Pat) 11

K.B.N.SINGH, R.K.CHOUDHARY
Mohammad Hasan – Appellant
Versus
Mohammad Anwar Ahmad – Respondent


Judgment

R.K.Choudhary, J.

1. This civil revision application is directed against an order of the Subordinate Judge of Darbhanga, dated the 23rd September, 1965, holding that the filing of the award by the arbitrator was beyond time and the case was, therefore, barred by limitation.

2. It appears that certain disputes between the parties were decided by arbitration without the intervention of the Court, and the arbitrator gave his award on the 16th June, 1963. It was registered on the 11th July, 1963, and the notice of the making of the award was given to the parties on the 12th July, 1963. The award, however, was filed by the arbitrator in Court on the 22nd April, 1965 and a miscellaneous case, No. 41 of 1965, was started. Opposite party No. 3 of the Court below raised a point that, the award having been filed after the expiry of the period of limitation, it could not be made a rule of the Court as being barred by limitation. It was contended on his behalf that the question of limitation should be decided as a preliminary point; and the learned Subordinate Judge, reviving on a decision of this Court in Rambilas Mahto V/s. Durga Bijai Prasad Singh AIR 1965 Pat 239, held that the awa


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top