HARI LAL AGRAWAL
Sarajubala Devi – Appellant
Versus
Chairman And Commissioner Of Chaibassa Municipality – Respondent
1. This application in revision by the defendant arises out of a suit by the Chairman and Commissioners of Chaibassa Municipality for recovery of Rs. 837.50, being the arrears of Municipal taxes for the period 1966-67 to 1968-69.
2. Admittedly Holding No. 188 in Ward No. 1 of the Chaibassa Municipality belonged to one Sudhir Kumar Ghose. The petitioner, claims to have purchased half portion of the said holding by a registered sale deed dated 20-1-1961 (Ext. E). The Municipality brought the suit for recovery of the arrears of taxes for the entire holding. According to the evidence on the record and the findings of the courts below, it is clear that the holding in question was not divided as yet, nor the name of the defendant was mutated over the portion of the holding said to have been purchased by her. The trial court recorded a finding that the defendant was the owner of the western half portion of the holding in question, and not of the entire holding. It, however, dismissed the suit for the reason that the Municipality having not apportioned the taxes in respect of half of the holding of the defendant, the court itself could not perform that duty in violation of the mach
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.