SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Pat) 167

HARI LAL AGRAWAL
Anand Mohan Boral – Appellant
Versus
Bilas Bihari Lal – Respondent


Judgment

1. Both these Civil Revision Applications, which have been heard together and involve identical questions, are being disposed of herewith.

2. The relevant facts, briefly stated, are that the petitioner has got a building consisting of various shop rooms on Hospital Rd. in the town of Daltonganj. Two contiguous shop rooms of the above building were let out to the opposite party under two separate leases, each for a fixed period of 11 months beginning from the 1st July 1969 to 31st May 1970, on certain rents. Some time after the expiry of the period of the aforesaid leases, the petitioner filed two applications in the court of the Munsif, Daltonganj under Sec.12(3) of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1947, for eviction of the opposite party from each of the two shop rooms. A claim for damages was also made, but we are not concerned with the same in these applications.

3. The opposite party filed objection and one of the points raised by him in both the cases was that the application was not maintainable, inasmuch as, in this case recourse to the provisions of Sec.12, Sub-Secs. (1) and (2) of the Act was not resorted to. Objections on various other g







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top