SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Pat) 279

UDAY SINHA, S.K.CHOUDHURI, BIRENDRA PRASAD SINHA, NAGENDRA PRASAD SINGH, P.S.SAHAY
Harish Chandra Mishra – Appellant
Versus
S. Ali Ahmed – Respondent


Judgment

N.P.SINGH, J.

1. Three Advocates of this Court have filed this application alleging that a Judge of this Court has committed contempt of Court by making insulting and uncharitable remarks against an Advocate Dr. Sadanand Jha while hearing a civil revision application for admission.

2. The Civil Revision application had been listed before S.Ali Ahmed, J. a Judge of this Court (hereinafter to be referred to as the opposite party) for admission on 19-7-1985. According to the petitioners, after the lunchon interval when the opposite party took his beat Mr. Syed Imam Ali. Advocate mentioned to the Court that a caveat petition and an affidavit had been filed on behalf of opposite party No.3 of that case, and, as such, the petitioner of that civil revision application be directed to hand over a copy of the petition to the caveator so that a proper counter-affidavit may be filed. He also made a prayer for adjournment of the case for a week. On this the opposite party asked the counsel for the petitioner of that case as to whether he was agreeable to the suggestion made by Mr. Syed Imam Ali. Mr. Naseem Ahmad, who appeared for the petitioner of that application, replied that he will





















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top