SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(All) 53

K.B.SRIVASTAVA, ONKAR SINGH
JANARDAN PRASAD GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
O. P. CHAKARVARTY – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

K. B. Srivastava, J.:- The petitioner Dr. Janardan Prasad Gupta alleges that Dr. O.P. Chakravarty, Additional Director of Medical and Health Services and Drugs Controller, Uttar Pradesh, and Dr. Niranjan Prasad, Assistant Drugs Controller, Uttar Pradesh, the two respondents before us, have committed criminal contempt of this Court under sub-clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) of clause (c) of Section 2, Contempt of Courts Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and consequently they deserve punishment under Section 12 of the Act.

2. It is not disputed by either side that the alleged contempt was not committed in the face of this Court, so as to fall within the purview of Section 14 of the Act. Similarly, it is not disputed that it lies within the ambit of Section 15 of the Act. The proceedings have not been initiated on its own motion by this Court or on a motion made by the Advocate-General. The petitioner further admits that he has not made the motion with the consent in writing of the Advocate-General. The preliminary objection raised by the respondents is that cognizance of a criminal contempt, other than one falling under Section 14, can be taken by this Court only on its own


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top