SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Pat) 89

NAZIR AHMAD, UDAY SINHA
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Fair Weather Transport Corporation – Respondent


Judgment

1. These two references under Sec.256(1) of Income-tax Act, 1961, relate to the assessment years 1965-66 and 1966-67. The question referred to us for our opinion is :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the amended provisions of Sec.275 were not applicable to penalty proceedings under Sec.271(1)(a) which were pending on April 1, 1971 and the proceeding is time-barred ?"

2. The assessee was required to submit returns for the two assessment years in question. The returns had to be filed by September 30, 1965, and September 30, 1966, for the two assessment years. They were, in fact, filed on February 28, 1968. In the course of the assessment proceeding, the Income-tax Officer initiated proceedings for imposition of penalty in terms of Sec.271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act. It would be relevant to state here that the assessments for the two assessment years were completed on November 3, 1969. The penalty, in terms of Sec.271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, was imposed by order dated March 28, 1972. The Income-tax Officer imposed a penalty of Rs. 8,336 for the assessment year 1965-66 and Rs. 11,883 for 1966-67,









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top