SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Pat) 31

UDAY SINHA, NAZIR AHMAD, G.G.SOHANI
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Shanti Goswami – Respondent


Judgment

Uday Sinha, J.

1. This is a reference under Sec. 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in relation to the assessment year 1970-71. The assessee was assessed in the status of a Hindu undivided family in relation to his shop styled "New Chaibasa Cycle Stores, Sadar Bazar, Chaibasa". The concern was sold to one N.P. Ahuja by a sale deed dated April 30, 1969, for Rs. 1,00,000. This was made up, according to the statement of the case, of closing value of stock-in-trade at Rs. 23,867.84. The outstanding dues with others was to the tune of Rs. 2,257.48. Rs. 71,918.90 was taken as long-term capital gain. The sale deed did not mention sale of any goodwill. The assessee did not state before the Income-tax Officer about the sale of any goodwill nor did the Income-tax Officer make any reference about goodwill. Surprisingly somehow the Appellate Assistant Commissioner treated this amount as being on account, of goodwill of the shop "New Chaibasa Cycle Stores". Describing the said sum as representing goodwill, the whole matter received a twist. Before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, a letter dated May 26, 1971, was filed. This letter showed that there was an offer of Rs. 73,000 on ac
















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top