UDAY SINHA, NAZIR AHMAD, G.G.SOHANI
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Shanti Goswami – Respondent
Uday Sinha, J.
1. This is a reference under Sec. 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in relation to the assessment year 1970-71. The assessee was assessed in the status of a Hindu undivided family in relation to his shop styled "New Chaibasa Cycle Stores, Sadar Bazar, Chaibasa". The concern was sold to one N.P. Ahuja by a sale deed dated April 30, 1969, for Rs. 1,00,000. This was made up, according to the statement of the case, of closing value of stock-in-trade at Rs. 23,867.84. The outstanding dues with others was to the tune of Rs. 2,257.48. Rs. 71,918.90 was taken as long-term capital gain. The sale deed did not mention sale of any goodwill. The assessee did not state before the Income-tax Officer about the sale of any goodwill nor did the Income-tax Officer make any reference about goodwill. Surprisingly somehow the Appellate Assistant Commissioner treated this amount as being on account, of goodwill of the shop "New Chaibasa Cycle Stores". Describing the said sum as representing goodwill, the whole matter received a twist. Before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, a letter dated May 26, 1971, was filed. This letter showed that there was an offer of Rs. 73,000 on ac
Agha Abdul Jabbar Khan V/s. Cit
Anil Kumar Roy Chowdhury V/s. Cit
Cit V/s. Chunilal Prabhudas And Co.
Cit V/s. Hind Motor Cycle Works
Cit V/s. Mugneeram Bangur And Co.
Cit V/s. Imperial Chemical Industries (India) (P.) Ltd.
Karnani Properties Ltd. V/s. Cit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.