P.B.MUKHARJI, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, W. B. III – Appellant
Versus
CHUNILAL PRABHUDAS AND CO. (DEFUNCT FIRM) – Respondent
( 1 ) THE statement of the case raises the following question for an answer by this Court :--"whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in holding that no capital gains could arise under Section 12-B of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 out of the transfer by the firm of its assets and goodwill to the two private limited companies?"
( 2 ) BEFORE proceeding to answer this question it will be appropriate to reframe the question by dropping the words "assets and" from the question because no argument has been advanced before us either on behalf of the assessee or the Commissioner on assets other than goodwill. The controversy is confined in this case only to goodwill and nothing else. In fact, no question arises with regard to other assets from the order of the Tribunal. The question re-framed, therefore, for the answer by this Court is as follows :--"whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in holding that no capital gains could arise under Section 12-B of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 out of the transfer by the firm of its goodwill to the two private limited companies?"
( 3 ) THE facts
REFERRED TO : Commr.of Income-tax, Calcutta v. Mungneeram Bangur and Co.
Jogta Coal Co. Ltd. v. Commr. of I.T., West Bengal
Tata Hydro-Electric Agency Co. Ltd. v. Commr. of Income-tax
Commr. of Income-tax, Gujarat v. B.M.Kharwar
Revenue of Commr. of Income-tax, Calcutta v. Associated Clothiers Ltd.
Cambatta and Co. Ltd. v. Commr. of Excess Profits Tax, Bombay
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.