SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Pat) 444

SATYESHWAR ROY, B.N.AGRAWAL, N.PANDEY
Gobardhan Lal Soneja – Appellant
Versus
Binod Kumar Sinha – Respondent


Judgment

Satyeshwar Roy, J.

1. The plaintiff filed Title Suit No. 31 of 1985 in the court of Subordinate Judge, Begusarai for declaration of his title, confirmation of possession and permanent injunction with regard to the suit property The value of the suit Rs. 10,025. Opposite parties No. 1 to 7 filed their written statement contesting the suit. Opposite parties No. 8 to 10 filed an application under Order I, Rule 10 of the Code of Civil of Procedure for adding them as parties in that suit. That was allowed. The order was challenged by the petitioner in Civil Revision No. 151 of 1987 which was disposed of on 31-10-1987 with the direction that the suit be disposed of within three months from the date of receipt of the order. The suit was pending in the court of Munsif. Second, Begusarai, from 30-10-1987. It was ordered that the Title Suit No. 219 of 1985 filed by the opposite parties No 8 to 10 should be heard analogous with the Title Suit No. 31 of 1985.

2. By order of the District Judge, the Court of Munsif received on transfer the Title Suit No. 31 of 1985, as his pecuniary jurisdiction was raised to Rs. 30,000 by an amendment in the Begal, Agra, Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887 (he
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top