PATNA HIGH COURT
B.L.Yadav and I.R.Singh JJ.
Ram Charitra Das
Versus
State Of Bihar
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8536 of 1994 ;
Decided On : FEBRUARY 26, 1996
BIHAR SAW MILLS (REGULATION) ACT, 1990 - CONSTITUTIONALITY - LEGISLATIVE COMPETENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURE - ENTRY 17-A OF CONCURRENT LIST-III OF 7TH SCHEDULE OF CONSTITUTION - INTERPRETATION - SCOPE AND AMBIT OF THE EXPRESSION "FOREST" - PROTECTION AND CONSERVATION OF FOREST AND ENVIRONMENT - VALIDITY OF ACT AND RULES - WRIT PETITION CHALLENGING THE ACT AND RULES - DISMISSAL.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, proprietors of saw mills and saw pits, filed two writ petitions challenging the Bihar Saw Mills (Regulation) Act, 1990 (the Act) and the rules framed thereunder. They contended that the Act was ultra vires the Constitution, violative of Articles 14, 16, 19, 20, 21, 245, 246, 300-A, and 301, and sought a declaration to that effect and a writ quashing the notices issued under the Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the Bihar State Legislature had the legislative competence to enact the Act under Entry 17-A of the Concurrent List-III of the 7th Schedule of the Constitution. The court interpreted the expression "forest" in Entry 17-A broadly to include trees, timber, and ancillary matters related to the regulation of trade and sale of forest produce, including the establishment and operation of saw mills and saw pits. The court found that the Act was a beneficial legislation aimed at protecting the environment and maintaining ecological balance, and that it was not violative of any of the constitutional provisions cited by the petitioners.
Issues: 1. Whether the Bihar State Legislature had the legislative competence to enact the Bihar Saw Mills (Regulation) Act, 1990 under Entry 17-A of the Concurrent List-III of the 7th Schedule of the Constitution? 2. Whether the expression "forest" in Entry 17-A included trees, timber, and ancillary matters related to the regulation of trade and sale of forest produce, including the establishment and operation of saw mills and saw pits? 3. Whether the Act was violative of Articles 14, 16, 19, 20, 21, 245, 246, 300-A, and 301 of the Constitution?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the Bihar State Legislature had the legislative competence to enact the Act under Entry 17-A of the Concurrent List-III of the 7th Schedule of the Constitution. The court interpreted the expression "forest" in Entry 17-A broadly to include trees, timber, and ancillary matters related to the regulation of trade and sale of forest produce, including the establishment and operation of saw mills and saw pits. The court found that the Act was a beneficial legislation aimed at protecting the environment and maintaining ecological balance, and that it was not violative of any of the constitutional provisions cited by the petitioners. 2. The court held that the expression "forest" in Entry 17-A included trees, timber, and ancillary matters related to the regulation of trade and sale of forest produce, including the establishment and operation of saw mills and saw pits. The court interpreted the expression broadly to give effect to the object of the Act, which was to protect the environment and maintain ecological balance.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petitions, holding that the Bihar Saw Mills (Regulation) Act, 1990 was intra vires the Constitution and that the notices issued under the Act were valid.
B. L. Yadav, J.
1. In these two analogous writ petitions (hereinafter to be referred to as first and second writ-petitions under Articles 226/227 of the constitution of India the petitioners have sought for the relief of an appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the Bihar Saw Mills (Regulation) Act, 1990 (for short "the Act") to be ultra vires, being violative of Articles 14, 16, 19, 20, 21, 245, 246, 300-A and 301 of the Constitution of India and also for issuance of a writ, order or direction quashing the notice dated 15-12-1993 and 3-11-1993 (Annexures 4 and 5, respectively), by which the proprietors of the Saw Mills/saw Pits have been asked to apply for their licence, failing which necessary action under the provisions of the said Act shall be taken. By the order dated 3-11-1993 (Annexure 5) the petitioners were informed to apply for licence for running saw mills according to the Bihar saw Mills (Regulation) Rules 1993 and by the order dated 15-12-1993 (Annexure 4) the petitioners were informed that penal action will be taken against them under the said Act in case they failed to comply with the direction.
2. Certain provisions of the Act may be noticed before grappling with the problem as to whether the Act was intra vires or ultra vires. A photostat copy of the bare Act has been filed as annexure 3 to these writ petitions. The object of the Act has been indicated to make the provision for regulating, in the public interest, the establishment and operations of the Saw Mills and Saw pits and trade of sawing for the protection and conservation of forest and the environment, and it was accordingly enacted by the legislature of the State of bihar in the Forty-first year of the republic of India. Sec.1 of the said act provides for short title. Sec.2 contains definition clause. Sections 3 and 4 enact the provisions for appointment of the licensing officer and prescribed authority. Sec.6 provides declaration of prohibited area. The state Government can provide by notification an area to be prohibited for such period not exceeding three years at a time. Sub-clause (2) of Sec.3 of the Act posits as to what shall happen and what are the consequences once an area is declared prohibited. The consequence of clause (a) of Sec.6 is that no licence shall be granted for establishment of saw mill or a saw pit in that area; and (b) provides that no licence shall be renewed during that period; and clause (c) is to the effect that a saw mill or saw-pit situated in that area shall cease to operate and keep its sawing operation closed. Sec.7 of the Act postulates grant, renewal, revocation or suspension of licence. Sec.8 postulates power of entry, inspection, search, seizures, etc. Sec.10 deals with keeping of the accounts of stock of wood in saw-mill and saw-pit. Sec.11 of the act is for prohibition of electric connection etc. in unlicensed saw-mills.
3. Section 12 provides for appeal and it is to the effect that any person aggrieved by the order of refusal of a licensing officer to grant or renew a licence, or by the order of suspension or revocation of a licence, may within thirty days of the service on him of the order of such refusal or suspension or revocation, appeal to the prescribed authority, who shall decide the appeal after giving the appellant and the licensing officer an opportunity of being heard. Sec.13 posits the condition under which the saw mill can be confiscated. Sec.14 provides penalty and section 15 enacts the offence by the companies. Sec.16 deals with the burden of proof, and Sec.17 enacts the cognizance of offence; and Section 18 provides that no Court inferior to that of a Judicial Magistrate of the first class, shall try any offence punishable under this Act. Sec.19 provides about the offence. Sec.21 provides protection of action taken in good faith. Sec.22 is about the rewards, and section 23 posits rule-making power of the State. Sec.24 posits for other acts and laws not to apply to saw-mill or saw
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.