1. Heard the parties.

2. All the three writ applications were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order with the consent of the parties, as the petitioners are either the employees of the Sugar Corporation or the Fisheries Development Corporation, who had been sent on deputation to the State Government for absorption of their services from where now they were being repatriated to their Parent Department. Petitioners in all the three applications are aggrieved by the said order of repatriation as according to them, as their deputation was in view of the decision of the State for absorption they cannot be treated as a person on deputation and can be sent back any time.

3. On the other hand it has been contended that in view of the Circular of the Finance Department dated 16.11.99 there can be deputation of a State employee in Public Sector Undertaking but not vice versa, as such, it has been contended by the learned Counsel for the State appearing in these writ applications that as a deputationist does not have any right and as a Circular of the Finance Department debarring such deputationist was there from before, as such, these writ applications should n