S.K.KATRIAR
Shailendra Nath – Appellant
Versus
State Bank Of India – Respondent
1. This writ petition has been preferred to quash Clause 1 of the Memorandum of Instructions (Annexure-2), issued by the respondent Bank for empanelment of vendors of paper, loose leaf binders, stationery items etc. and printers, whereby prohibition has been imposed on the empanelment of persons whose near relatives as defined therein are working in the Bank.
2. According to the writ petition, the petitioner is the sole proprietor of a firm of printers engaged in the business of printing since the year 1986, and empanelled as printers with the respondent Bank, Local Head Office, Patna, since 1994. An advertisement was published in the local Hindi newspaper "Hindustan" on 26.9.2004 (Annexure-1), inviting applications for empanelment of vendors of paper, stationary items, printers etc. within 15 days. The applicants were required to conform to the general terms and conditions governing the empanelment incorporated in the impugned Memorandum of Instructions (Annexure-2). Clause 1 is the impugned portion and is set out herein below.
1. Near relative as defined by the Bank viz. (Spouse, Father (including step father), Mother (including step mother), Son (including step-son) and/
Baliram Prasad V/s. Union Of India
Fertilizer Corporation Kamagar Union (Regd.) Sindri And Ors. V/s. Union Of India And Ors.
Kasturi Lal Lakshmi Reddy Etc. V/s. The State Of Jammu & Kashmir And Anr.
M.R.F. Ltd. V/s. Inspector, Kerala Govt. And Ors.
Shri Sitaram Sugar Co. V/s. Union Of India
State Of Punjab V/s. Ram Lubhaya Bagga
Tarsem Singh V/s. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. And Etc.
Tata Cellular V/s. Union Of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.