S.K.KATRIAR
Ajay Kumar Pathak – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
Sudhir Kumar Katriar, J.
1. This writ petition has been preferred with the following prayer:
(i) A certiorari setting aside the office order No. 176, dated 23.1.1999, passed by the respondent Director as contained in Annexure-6, whereby and whereunder the petitioner has illegally been dismissed from service;
(ii) A certiorari setting aside the order as contained in memo No. 696, dated 31.3.2000 issued by the respondent Commissioner -cum- Secretary, as contained in Annexure-7, whereby and whereunder the appeal filed on behalf of the petitioner against the order of dismissal has illegally been rejected.
(iii) A mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service and allow him to discharge his duties in the department without any hindrance.
2. According to the writ petition, the petitioner at the relevant point of time was a Class-III employee and acting Peshkar in the office of the Special Land Acquisition Office No. 3, Suwarnrekha Pariyojana, Mango, Jamshedpur. An enquiry proceeding was started against the petitioner and others for acts of omission and commission during the course of land acquisition proceedings and payment of compensatio
Bombay V/s. Shashikant S. Patil And Anr.
Managing Director, Ecil, Hyderabad And Anr. V/s. B. Karunakar And Ors.
Principal Secretary, Govt. Of A.P. And Anr. V/s. M. Adinarayana
State Bank Of Patiala V/s. S.K. Sharma
State Of Andhra Pradesh V/s. S. Sree Rama Rao
State Of Tamil Nadu V/s. Thiru K.V. Perumal And Ors.
State Of West Bengal V/s. Atul Krishna Shaw And Anr.
Union Of India And Ors. V/s. Mohd. Ramzan Khan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.