SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Pat) 536

NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH
R. G. Holdings Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. Petitioner is the owner of a public, carrier truck No. HR 55/1330 and while it was carrying for the work undertaken by the Company, cable wiring, machines and other articles and equipments to Bahadurganj in district-Kishanganj being the worksite of the petitioner-Company, the truck was seized by District Transport Officer (DTO), Purnea, respondent No. 2 who is respondent No. 3, in person at Zero Mile, Gulab Bagh in the district of Purnea on 4.4.2007. The writ petition was filed on 25.7.2007 as by then the said respondent had merely held back the truck seized and was not releasing the same. Thus, the writ application was ostensibly filed for release from illegal seizure and compensation for long, illegal detention of the truck. In course of the proceedings on 8.11.2007, a counter affidavit was filed by respondent No. 2, the DTO, Purnea and on prima facie satisfaction of this Court that the authority had acted willfully mala fide, he (DTO, Purnea) was directed to be added as party by name and notices were issued to him to show cause why pecuniary damages be not ordered for recovery from him for mala fide exercise of authority and in the meantime, he was directed to release













































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top