SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Pat) 2112

MIHIR KUMAR JHA
Mahendra Prasad Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


ORDER

Heard counsel for the parties.

2. In this writ application the petitioner a retired Government servant has assailed his order of punishment dated 18.03.2003 withholding 25 per cent of his pension for a period of ten years on the ground of certain alleged misconduct committed by him during his active service period.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner while assailing the impugned order of punishment has submitted that the same has been passed not only on the mere ipse dixit of the higher Authorities but also by choosing to discriminate the petitioner between the same set of persons who were facing identical allegation. In this regard, he has explained that the petitioner was a Section Officer and therefore, the allegation against him that he alone had been responsible for issuance of a transfer order of 46 Medical Officers in disobedience/defiance of the order of the Chief Minister, who had only approved transfer of only one out of 46 Medical Officers was wholly incorrect, inasmuch as, such order of chain transfer of 46 medical officers was issued after approval of all the concerned Authorities up to the level of departmental Secretary. He has also submitted that when no othe

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top