RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA
Harendra Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
2. In brief, the case is that opposite party no. 2, Kishori Mahto (since deceased), filed the complaint petition in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah, alleging therein that accused petitioner no. 1, Harendra Mahto, who is his nephew is separated to him and has no concerned to his property. He used to cultivate his land separately and has sold his land to Baristar Rao. The complainant-opposite party no. 2 further alleged that he came to know that his nephew, accused-petitioner no. 1, Harendra Mahto has filed the Title Suit No. 63 of 1992, pending in the Court of Sub-Judge- IV, Bettiah, using forged gift deed dated 27.09.1988 regarding his land deta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.