Back
MIHIR KUMAR JHA, ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI
Jitan Rai – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
2. It has to be noted at this place itself that the trial court had also convicted co-accused Hira Rai and co-accused Ekbal Rai for offence under sections 302 and 148 of the Indian Penal Code sentencing them to undergo R.I. for life and also R.I. for two years but their appeal on account of their death during the pendency of this appeal has stood abated as recorded in the order of this Court dated 14.9.2011.
3. The prosecution case, in brief, as per First Information Report recorded at the instance of Suresh Singh (P.W.6) on 5.9.1986 at 2.30 P.M. is that on the same day at about 11 A.M. in the morning while he along with his brother
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
