(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA)

I.A. No. 1888 of 2013 has been filed to condone delay of approximately 11 days in filing of the Appeal. Considering the duration and explanation for delay, important questions of law involved, submission of the parties, we condone the delay.

2. Respondent no. 1, the Bihar Human Rights Commission (hereinafter referred to as =the Commission‘), has not entered appearance despite valid service of notice. Respondent no.2 entered appearance suo-moto. Notice could not be served on respondent's 3, 4 and5. Subsequently it was directed to be served through respondent no.6. Respondent no.5 then entered appearance. Respondent no.6 stated that no person by the name of respondents 3 and 4 was enrolled with them.

3. The present Appeal assails order dated 18.12.2012 dismissing CWJC 18780 of 2012. It affirms order dated 28.5.2012 passed by the Commission fixing remuneration payable to Contract Data Entry Operators holding they should be paid one notch higher as per the proposed wage structure, i.e. Rs.10,086/-, recommended for proposed grade II. The recommendation dated 24.12.2011 of the Official Committee headed by the Principle Secretary, Finance, wa