SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Pat) 935

MIHIR KUMAR JHA
Dhananjay Kumar Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Bihar Staff Selection Commission through its Secretary, Veterinary College, Patna – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: M/s Chitaranjan Sinha, Dinu Kumar, Abhinav Srivastava, Shiv Kumar Prabhakar, Amish Kumar, Saket Tiwary, Sanjeev Kumar Dubey, Ansul, Javed Aslam, Manish Kumar.
For the State : M/s Rajesh Kumar, Rajesh Singh, R.K. Verma, Mrs. Namrata Mishra.
For the Bihar Staff Selection Commission: M/s Jitendra Singh, Satyavir Bharti, Rajesh Singh, Satyam Shivam Sundaram.
For the Private Respondents: M/s Rajendra Prasad Singh, Ajay, Rakesh Kumar Ranjan, Pramod Kumar, Deepak Kumar, Shiv Kumar Prabhakar, Binod Kumar Singh.

JUDGMENT

1. In all these five writ applications the petitioners have assailed the result of Graduate Level Combined (Main Examination) 2010 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Main Examination') in respect of Advertisement No. 110/2010 whereby and whereunder 25792 candidates have been declared successful by the Bihar Staff Selection Commission (hereinafter referred to as "the Commission") for being considered for their appointment on 3285 Class-III graduate level posts under the State Government. By way of consequential reliefs, they have also prayed for restraining the official respondents either from proceeding for counseling of aforesaid 25792 successful candidates or issuing appointment letters to them against 3285 Class-III posts. A further direction has also been sought by them for commanding the Commission to conduct the Main Examination afresh on the basis of earlier result of the preliminary test conducted by the Commission wherein only 16425 candidates were declared successful for appearing in the Main Examination. In addition to the aforementioned common prayer in all the writ applications, a separate prayer has also been made only in C.W.J.C. No.3640/2013, which incidentall
































































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top