SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Pat) 935

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
MIHIR KR. JHA, J.
Dhananjay Kumar Mishra & Ors.
Arun Kumar & Ors.
Santosh Kumar & Ors.
Niraj Kumar Kantha & Ors.
Ajay Kumar & Ors. – Petitioners
Vs.
The Bihar Staff Selection Commission through its Secretary, Veterinary College, Patna-800014 & Ors.
The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary & Ors.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Vikash Bhawan, Patna & Ors.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of General Administration, Govt. of Bihar, Patna & Ors.
CWJC Nos. 3640, 3740, 4104, 4265 and 5103 of 2013
Decided on: 20.8.2013

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: M/s Chitaranjan Sinha, Dinu Kumar, Abhinav Srivastava, Shiv Kumar Prabhakar, Amish Kumar, Saket Tiwary, Sanjeev Kumar Dubey, Ansul, Javed Aslam, Manish Kumar.
For the State : M/s Rajesh Kumar, Rajesh Singh, R.K. Verma, Mrs. Namrata Mishra.
For the Bihar Staff Selection Commission: M/s Jitendra Singh, Satyavir Bharti, Rajesh Singh, Satyam Shivam Sundaram.
For the Private Respondents: M/s Rajendra Prasad Singh, Ajay, Rakesh Kumar Ranjan, Pramod Kumar, Deepak Kumar, Shiv Kumar Prabhakar, Binod Kumar Singh.

Headnote:Service Law-Writ petitions-Five writ petitions filed for assailing the result of Graduate Level Combined (Main Examination 2010 whereby and where under 25792 candidates have been declared successful-By of consequential reliefs it has also been prayed for the official respondents either from proceeding for counselling of the successful candidates or issuing appointment letters-There is no any such inherent infirmity which has in fact vitiated the entire selection process-High Court in absence of any evidence to show that there was any glaring malpractice in the examination or preparation of result would reject the prayer for cancellation of the entire selection process. (Paras 67 & 70)

       2002(3) SCC 146; 1994 (2) SCC 718; 2004 (7) SCC 112; 2010 (6) SCC 759- 1994 (4) SCC 165-Referred to.

JUDGMENT

1. In all these five writ applications the petitioners have assailed the result of Graduate Level Combined (Main Examination) 2010 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Main Examination') in respect of Advertisement No. 110/2010 whereby and whereunder 25792 candidates have been declared successful by the Bihar Staff Selection Commission (hereinafter referred to as "the Commission") for being considered for their appointment on 3285 Class-III graduate level posts under the State Government. By way of consequential reliefs, they have also prayed for restraining the official respondents either from proceeding for counseling of aforesaid 25792 successful candidates or issuing appointment letters to them against 3285 Class-III posts. A further direction has also been sought by them for commanding the Commission to conduct the Main Examination afresh on the basis of earlier result of the preliminary test conducted by the Commission wherein only 16425 candidates were declared successful for appearing in the Main Examination. In addition to the aforementioned common prayer in all the writ applications, a separate prayer has also been made only in C.W.J.C. No.3640/2013, which incidentally is the main case wherein all the pleadings have been filed by all the parties, that this Court should direct for holding an enquiry by an independent agency, namely, Central Bureau of Investigation (C.B.I.) in the entire selection process undertaken by the Commission in respect of the aforementioned Advertisement No. 110/2010 pertaining to Graduate Level Combined Competitive Examination.

2. The facts which would be sufficient to be noticed for disposal of all these writ applications lie in a very narrow compass. The Commission on 18.6.2010 had issued an advertisement notifying l569 vacancies of Graduate Level Post in various departments of the State Government and the last date for filing application was 26.7.2010. The Commission on receipt of 3,85,799 applications and after their screening had conducted a preliminary written test on 18.12.2011 in which 253795 candidates had appeared at various centres all over Bihar. The result of the aforesaid preliminary test was published by the Commission on 12.4.2012 wherein 16425 candidates were declared successful for appearing in the Main Examination.

3. It is the case of the petitioners that in the meantime, the police had registered Economic Offence P.S. Case No. 23/2012 dated 20.10.2012 for offences under Sections 420, 468, 472, 120B of the Indian Penal Code disclosing that the miscreants had tampered the answer sheets (OMR sheets) after entering in the office and strong room of the Commission relating to the different examinations including that of Junior Engineers, Auditors, Secretariat Assistants (i.e. present selection). In this regard the petitioners in C.W.J.C. No. 3640/2013 have made detailed averments and have referred to press release dated 21.10.2012 issued by the Chairman of the Commission assuring to cancel the result of any examination conducted by the Commission if the allegation of tampering the answer sheets in the aforesaid criminal case was found to be true. It has however been alleged that the officials of the Commission including its Chairman did not extend the necessary co-operation in investigation of the aforementioned police case, Economic Offence P.S. Case No. 23/2012 and only due to that the police could not properly investigate the interpolation in the OMR sheets of the present examinations.

4. From the pleadings it is also clear that a batch of writ applications, namely, C.W.J.C. No. 10268/2012, CW.J.C. No. 10683/2012, C.W.J.C. No.12209/2012, C.W.J.C. No. 12506/2012, CW.J.C. No. 14078/2012 and C.W.J.C. No. 19678/2012 were filed for cancellation of the result of the aforesaid preliminary test dated 12.4.2012 wherein also a prayer was made for registering a First Information Report in respect of the criminal misconduct committed by the authorities of the Commission in the tamperin












































































































































































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top