SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Pat) 377

KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL
Renu Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajendra Prasad Singh, Rakesh Kumar Singh.
For the Respondent: Mr. Shanti Kumar.

ORAL ORDER

Aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 14.01.2013 passed by learned Sub-Judge-IV-cum-the Election Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as Election Tribunal) in Election Case No. 110 of 2011 (Annexure-1), the petitioner (respondent in the said Election Petition) has filed the present writ application seeking appropriate writ/order for quashing the entire election case pending before the Election Tribunal. According to the petitioner, continuance of the said proceeding is sheer abuse of the process of the law. By the said order, the Tribunal, on the consideration of the materials placed before it, both oral and documentary, came to the conclusion that the election petitioner, respondent no. 7 herein, had made out a case for recounting of the ballot papers and thus directed for recounting of the same in open Court in presence of the parties or their counsels.

2. The relevant facts briefly be noticed for appreciating the submissions of the parties.

3. The petitioner as well as Respondent No. 7 contested election for being elected Member of the Zila Parishad, Bettiah from Gaunaha Anchal of West Champaran. Apart from the petitioner and Respondent no. 7, eight other candidates h



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top