SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Pat) 4

L. NARASIMHA REDDY, I. A. ANSARI
State of Bihar through the Collector, Siwan – Appellant
Versus
Harendra Nath Tiwari – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants:Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate

Order

I.A. No.9583 of 2014

This application is filed with a prayer to condone the delay of 190 days in filing the Letters Patent Appeal stating that the delay occurred in the process of taking administrative decision and legal opinion and that there was no lapse or indifference on the part of the Department.

No counter affidavit was filed by the respondent opposing the application.

We are satisfied with the reasons assigned for the belated filing of the Letters Patent Appeal.

The application is, accordingly, ordered, and delay is condoned.

Letters Patent Appeal No.1696 of 2014

This Letters Patent Appeal is preferred against the common order dated 18.02.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case Nos.22052 and 22072 of 2013.

Both the writ petitions were directed against the order dated 26.02.2013/23.07.2013 passed by the Collector, Siwan-the first appellant herein, cancelling the Jamabandi dated 01.01.1946 in relation to Khata no.9, Survey No.50, of village-Mehandar, P.S. Siwan, District-Siwan, covering an area measuring 16 Katha 19 dhurs.

The plea of the respondent was that the first appellant- Collector, is not empowered to cancel the Jamabandi and Section 9 of










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top