ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH
Md. Kasim – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
This appeal on behalf of the appellant Md. Kasim is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 11.01.2012 and order of sentence dated 16.01.2012 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Saharsa in Special Case No. 07 of 2009 arising out of Birpur P.S. Case No. 97 of 2009, whereby and whereunder the appellant and nine others were convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 20-B and 23 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (For short the NDPS Act) and sentenced to undergo R.I. for ten years under Section 20-B and R.I. for ten years under Section 23 of the NDPS Act and to pay a fine of Rs. 1 lakh each for the offence under Section 20-B, and Rs. 1 lakh each for the offence under Section 23 of the NDPS Act, and in case of default of payment of fine, to undergo R.I. for a further period of three years. The sentences, however, have been directed to run concurrently.
2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 16.10.2009, while the informant Dinesh Kumar, Assistant Commandant, A-Company of 18th Batallion Sashastra Seema Bal (For the SSB), Birpur, Bihar and other personnel of SSB were deputed to keep vigil on Indo-Nepa
Noor Aga vs. State of Punjab & Anr. [(2008) 16 SCC 417]
Jitendra and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. [(2004) 10 SCC 562]
Ashok alias Dangra Jaiswal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh [(2011) 5 SCC 123]
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.