MUNGESHWAR SAHOO
Suthri – Appellant
Versus
Munilal Singh – Respondent
2. The plaintiff respondent filed the aforesaid suit claiming partition of his share to the extent of 8 bigha 7 katha 12.5 dhur in Schedule I land and half share in Schedule II land.
3. The plaintiff claimed the aforesaid relief for separate share alleging that Sri Sahay Mahto had two sons, namely, Abhilakh Mahto and Rajai Mahto. Abhilakh Mahto had two sons, Swarup Mahto and Parmeshwar Mahto. The plaintiffs are the sons of Swarup Mahto being the son of Munnilal Singh who was only son of Swarup Mahto. The defendants represented the branch of Parmeshwar Mahto. Rajai Mahto had two sons, Balak Mahto and Uchhant Mahto. Uchhant Mahto had one son Pitambar Mahto. Parmeshwar Mahto had two sons, Ramdeo Singh and Ram Dihal Singh. Ramedeo Singh is defendant No.1 and defendant No.2 is son of defendant No.1 whereas the defendant No.3 to 5 are the maternal grand son of Ram Dihal Singh. The furt
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.