JYOTI SARAN
Niagree Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Town Planning and Urban Development Department – Respondent
The petitioner is a builder-cum-developer and has entered into an agreement with the land owners for development of their property and construction of a Multi-storied building on a piece of land bearing Khesra No. 225, Sheet No. 63, Thana No. 139 Ward No. 6 in Mauza-Mohaerrampur presently Bhawarpokhar, Police Station Pirbahore in the town and district of Patna.
2. The petitioner by filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has questioned the order dated 25.7.2014 passed by the Municipal Commissioner in Vigilance Case No. 51A of 2013 whereby the constructions of the third floor having been found in deviation of the sanctioned map and the municipal bye-laws that the same has been declared illegal requiring the petitioner to demolish the same. Some other irregularities as well has been found on the third floor as well as in the setbacks. The order passed by the Municipal Commissioner stands confirmed in the order dated 4.3.2015 by the Municipal Building Tribunal-II, Patna in Appeal Case No. 42 of 2015 and the petitioner being aggrieved is before this Court.
3. Mr. Sanjay Singh learned counsel has appeared for the petitioner while the State is repre
Royal Paradise Hotel (P) Ltd. Versus State of Haryana & Ors. (2006) 7 SCC 597.
Priyanka Estates International(P) Vs. State of Assam. (2010)2 SCC 27.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.