SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Pat) 213

AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI
Babita Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Lakshmindra Kumar Yadav

JUDGMENT :

Annexure-7 is the order passed by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority and is dated 11.12.2012. By virtue of this order, not only the case filed by one Amaresh Kumar Amar was dismissed but even intervention filed on behalf of the petitioner and some other candidates came to be rejected.

In the second phase appointment of Panchayat Teachers for which certain exercise was done and initiated it is the case of the petitioner that they were duly appointed by the Gram Panchayat Raj, Jainagar Basti, Block Jainagar, District Madhubani by the Panchayat Secretary after following the process. This appointment was done in the light of Annexure-3, the directive issued by one District Superintendent of Education. However, while this petitioner was performing her duty a communication was made by the Block Education Officer directing the Principal of the school in question to restrain the petitioner and other similarly appointed from performing their duty, mark their attendance etc. It was because of the said communication that one of the candidate approached the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority and the petitioner with some others intervened.

In the proceedi





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top