I. A. ANSARI, CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
Most. Devanti Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar – Respondent
I.A. ANSARI, J.
1. Having been appointed, on compassionate ground, by the District Superintendent of Education, Gaya, as an Assistant Teacher on 21.08.1991, the original writ petitioner, namely, Rana Pratap Singh (since deceased), continued to serve as an Assistant Teacher, in Urdu Primary School, Madarpur, Dumaria, Gaya, with effect from 07.09.1991. The original writ petitioner remained absent from duty from April, 1997, until the time he presented his joining report, on 23.02.2008, with a medical certificate, whereby he was certified to be medically fit to resume his duty. The original writ petitioner’s joining report was not accepted nor was any formal rejection order passed; but the original writ petitioner was not allowed to rejoin his service. No departmental or disciplinary proceeding was initiated against the original writ petitioner for having remained absent from duty in the manner as indicated hereinbefore.
2. Having not been able to rejoin his service, the original writ petitioner filed a writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, which gave rise to C.W.J.C. No. 21857 of 2011. By his writ petition, the original writ petitioner sought for, int
M. Veerappa v. Evelyn Sequeria and Ors. (1988) 1 SCC 556
Melepurath Sankunni Ezuthassan v. Thekittil Geopalankutty Nair
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.