I. A. ANSARI, NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH, CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
Controller of Examination, Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Examination, 1999 – Appellant
Versus
Nidhi Sinha – Respondent
CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, J.
What would be the impact of migration of a Meritorious Reserved Category (MRC) candidate, if for the purpose of getting admission to a medical course/institution, he/she opts and is treated to be a reserved category candidate for the limited purpose of allotment of a medical course/institution, on a candidate, who has been placed at the bottom in the merit list of reserved category to which the said MRC candidate belongs, is the primary issue, which requires consideration in the present case, which been referred to Full Bench by a Division Bench of this Court, expressing inability to agree with the conclusions arrived at in the case of G.V. Nutan Vs. Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Exam, Board, reported in 2014 (2) PLJR 725, by a Division Bench of this Court.
2. A Division Bench of this Court, in case of G.V. Nutan (supra), relying on Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Union of India Vs. Ramesh Ram and Ors., reported in (2010) 7 SCC 234, has, in substance, held that when an MRC candidate vacates a seat in general category and prefers to opt for a seat, in his own category, for better preference of institution, the general category seat,
G.V. Nutan Vs. Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Exam, Board
Union of India Vs. Ramesh Ram and Ors.
Ritesh R. Sah Vs. Dr. Y.L. Yamul and Ors.
Rajesh Kumar Daria V. Rajasthan Public Service Commission
Indra Sawhney V. Union of India
R.K. Sabharwal V. State of Punjab
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.