RAVI RANJAN
Mamta Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Heard the parties and perused the records of the case.
Through this writ application, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 20.06.2016 passed by the Munsif, Barh in Election Petition Case No. 15 of 2016 as contained in Annexure 7 as also the letter 852 dated 24.06.2016 written by the Block Development Officer, Athmalgola as contained in Annexure 5, by which he communicated to the petitioner that the Munsif, Barh, District Patna, the Presiding Officer, has directed the Block Development Officer, Athmalgola vide letter dated 23.06.2016 as contained in Annexure 5/1 not to administer oath upon the declared winner, i.e., the petitioner, on the post of Mukhiya of Sabnima Gram Panchayat under Athmalagola Block.
The election petitioner has been impleaded as respondent no. 6, who has appeared through Vakalatnama and has been heard.
This matter is being heard and disposed of without issuing notice to the other private respondents in view of the fact that for the present dispute, as to whether such injunction order could have been passed or not is in between the election petition and the winning candidate, i.e., the writ petitioner. Other private respondents, who have contes
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.