HEMANT GUPTA, ANJANA MISHRA, SUDHIR SINGH
Laxmi Narain Singh, S/o Late Satyadeo Singh – Appellant
Versus
Addl. Member Board of Revenue, Bihar, Patna – Respondent
Sudhir Singh, J.
1. Whether re-examination of the view, expressed by the Full Bench of this Court, in the case of Yugal Kishore Singh v. State of Bihar (AIR 1985 Patna 265 : 1985 PLJR 554) is necessary, in the light of the provisions of The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, being the core 'issue' formulated by the Division Bench of this Court, which necessitates this reference to the Full Bench.
2. These two writ petitions are closely connected on facts and 'matter in issue', thus both of the writ petitions have been placed before the Full Bench, under reference, for analogous hearing.
3. Since the petitioners have raised plea of Benami ownership regarding the transferred land, therefore, the Division Bench of this Court taking into consideration the 'Prohibitions', envisaged under Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, has referred the matter for adjudication of 'issue' indicated above.
4. Primarily, we would like to take notice of the 'view' expressed by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Yugal Kishore Singh (Supra), in respect of, scope of adjudication of 'Benami ownership' under the proceedings of Section 16 (3) of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixatio
Keshvan v. State of Bombay, AIR 1951 SC 128
Mithilesh Kumari v. Prem Behari Khare
R. Rajagopal Reddy v. Padmini Chandrasekharan
Sk. Halaluddin and others v. Nabi Hassan and others
S. Sankara Hali and Sankara Institute of Philosophy and Culture v. Kishori Lal Goenka
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.