Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.

1. Appellant, Sunil Paswan has been found guilty for an offence punishable under Sections 341, 307 of the I.P.C. while appellant Karu Paswan has been found guilty for an offence punishable under Sections 341, 323 of the I.P.C. vide judgment of conviction dated 05.02.2015 and for that, appellant Sunil Paswan has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years as well as fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months, additionally, simple imprisonment for 15 days, respectively, with a further direction to run the sentences concurrently, while appellant Karu Paswan has been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for six months, simple imprisonment for 15 days, respectively with a further direction to run the sentences concurrently vide order of sentence dated 10.02.2015 by the Additional Sessions Judge-5th, Samastipur in Sessions Trial No. 253 of 2014.

2. Appeal was called out, but none appeared on behalf of appellants and so, Sri Animesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel been requested to assist the Court as an Amicus Curiae, which he accepted. During course of hearing, when the rec