SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Pat) 1407

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.
Ramjee Chaudhary son of Late Manik Chand Chaudhary & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case Nos. 9962 & 10029 of 2016
Decided On : 28-09-2016

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Y.V. Giri, Mr. Ashish Giri, Mr. P.K. Shahi, Mr. Raj Kishore Prasad
For the State : Mr. P.N. Shahi, Mr. Kumar Manish
For the B.P.S.C. : Mr. Sanjay Pandey
For the Respondents: Mr. Binod Kanth, Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, Mr. Parijat Saurav

The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the 'catch-up rule' and the concept of consequential seniority in the context of reservation in promotions, as well as the interpretation of the Bihar Public Works Department Code, Rule 27, to determine the seniority of employees.

Headnote:

Seniority - Challenge to Notification - Bihar Public Works Department Code, Rule 27 - The court discussed the final seniority list of Executive Engineers published under the notification and the challenge by the petitioners. The court analyzed the historical background, reservation in promotions, and the concept of 'catch-up rule' in the context of seniority. The legal provisions of the Bihar Public Works Department Code, Rule 27 were interpreted to determine the seniority of the petitioners and the private respondents. The court's decision was influenced by the constitutional provisions and judicial precedents related to reservation in promotions and consequential seniority.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenged a notification regarding the final seniority list of Executive Engineers, claiming that they were wrongly shown as junior to the private respondents. The petitioners started their careers as Assistant Engineers and earned promotions to the post of Executive Engineer and Superintending Engineer. The dispute arose due to the rearrangement of the cadre and allocation in the departments, resulting in the petitioners now working under the Rural Works Department.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed both writ applications, stating that the notifications did not suffer from any vice and were not required to be interfered with.

Issues: The main issue was the determination of seniority of the petitioners and the private respondents in the final seniority list of Executive Engineers, considering their appointments, promotions, and the application of reservation in promotions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the Bihar Public Works Department Code, Rule 27, and the application of the 'catch-up rule' in the context of reservation in promotions and consequential seniority. The court also considered the historical background and the constitutional provisions related to reservation in promotions.

Final Decision: The court dismissed both writ applications, upholding the notifications regarding the final seniority list of Executive Engineers.

JUDGMENT :

Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.

In both the writ applications the notification no.6716, dated 01.06.2016 issued under the signature of one Ram Bujhaban Choudhary, Special Secretary, Rural Works Department is under challenge. By virtue of this notification, the final seniority list of Executive Engineers has been fixed which has become a bone of contention for the petitioners in both the writ applications because according to them, these petitioners have been shown to be junior to the private respondents, which they are not, according to their stand. All the petitioners started their career under the State of Bihar primarily under the Road Construction Department or the Water Resources Department as Assistant Engineers. They have earned their promotion on the post of Executive Engineer and even Superintending Engineer in some case. Over a period of time, in the rearrangement of the cadre and allocation in the departments, the petitioners are now working under the Rural Works Department. The necessity for publication of a gradation list showing seniority of the Engineers, working under the department was felt, which culminated into the notification dated 01.06.2016, which is Annexure-8 to CWJC No.9962 of 2016 and Annexure-11 to CWJC No.10029 of 2016. The notification itself would indicate that the final seniority list has been published after inviting objections.

2. The brief facts which have been culled out from CWJC No.9962 of 2016 are that petitioner no. 1 was initially appointed in the Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar as an Assistant Engineer (Civil) in the year 1985. Subsequently he was promoted in Class I services as Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar in the year 1993 vide notification no. 4313(s) dated 14.07.1993. Thereafter the petitioner has also been promoted to the post of Superintending Engineer dated 23.09.2006 and since then has been rendering his service as Superintending Engineer.

3. Petitioner no. 2 was initially appointed in the post of Assistant Engineer, in Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna in the year 1987 and was subsequently promoted to the post of Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna in the year 1996 vide notification dated 27.08.1996 in which the name of petitioner no. 2 appears at serial no. 48. He was subsequently promoted to the post of Superintending Engineer in the year 2008 vide notification dated 30.07.2008 in the name of the petitioner appears at serial no. 7 and since then has been rendering his services as Superintending Engineer.

4. Petitioner no. 3 was initially appointed in the post of Assistant Engineer, in the Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna in the year 1989 and was subsequently promoted to the post of Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna in the year 1999 w.e.f. 1997 vide notification no. 2408 dated 04.08.1999 in which the name of petitioner no. 3 appears at serial no. 42. He was subsequently promoted to the post of Superintending Engineer in the year 2009 and since then has been rendering his services as Superintending Engineer.

5. It is stated that these departments comes under the public works department and as per the Bihar Public Works Department Code, (herein referred to as "PWD Code") the establishment of Public Works Department consist of as following:-

(a) The Bihar Engineering Service, Class-I

(b) The Bihar Engineering Service, Class-II

(c) The Bihar Subordinate Engineering Service

(d) Revenue establishment

(e) Office establishment

(f) Petty establishment

6. It is stated that the Bihar Engineering Service Class-I Cadre consist of post of Executive Engineer which is entry level post, the Superintending Engineer, the Chief Engineer and Engineer-in-Chief. Whereas the Bihar Engineering Service Class-II Cadre consist of post of only Assistant Engineer. Thus the pay scale of the post of Assistant Engineer and the pay scale of the post of































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top