V. NATH
Sushil Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar Through Chief Secretary – Respondent
V. Nath, J.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. In view of the amplified nature of the issue arising for consideration in the present writ application, the learned counsel for the parties who have filed their respective intervention petitions for being impleaded as parties, have also been heard.
3. The irksome issue of reservation in promotion with consequential seniority has surfaced again in this writ application wherein the petitioners have questioned the legality and propriety of the resolution dated 21.08.2012 issued by the State Government (Annexure-13) taking the decision to continue the provision for reservation in promotion with consequential seniority to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes employees in services under the State Government. By filing the interlocutory application (I.A.No.9227/13), the prayer has been made by the petitioners for addition of the reliefs regarding quashing of the different promotion orders and seniority lists mentioned in detail and annexed with the said interlocutory application.
4. All the writ petitioners are government servants holding different posts in different departments. It is the case of the petitioners that in v
Akhil Bharatiya Soshit Karamchari Sangh (Railway) v. Union of India (1981) 1 SCC 246
Indra Sawhney Vs. Union of India
R.K. Sabharwal Vs. State of Punjab
U.P. Power Corporation Ltd Vs. Rajesh Kumar
Ashoka Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India
E.V. Chennaiah Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Rohtas Bhankhar Vs. Union of India
Anil Chandra Vs. Radha Krishna Gaur 2009 (9) SCC 454
Nair Service Society Vs. State of Kerala (2007) 4 SCC 1
Union of India Vs Virpal Singh Chauhan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.