ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY, J.:–In this intra-Court Appeal the appellants have assailed the judgment and order dated 16.7.2015 passed by the Writ Court in CWJC No. 9511 of 1995.

2. The brief facts for adjudication of the present Letters Patent Appeal are set out herein below:

CWJC No. 9511 of 1995 was filed by the respondent No. 5 against the decision of the Deputy Director, Consolidation (Headquarters), Bihar, Patna dated 30th September, 1995 in Revision Case No. 645 of 1989 and the order dated 19.9.1988 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Rohtas at Sasaram in Appeal No. 77 of 1985-86.

3. From the pleadings of the parties, it appears that during the pendency of the consolidation proceedings in the village in question three petitions were filed, two by one Ram Bharat Dubey, respondent no. 5 in the instant appeal, being Case Nos. 54/1984-85 and 55/1985-85 and one by Bhagwan Dubey against Jagdish Dubey and others, being case No. 70 of 1985-85. In case No. 54/1985-86, Ram Bharat Dubey, respondent No. 5 herein claimed that he has acquired right, title and interest pursuant to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document