1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

2. Petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 28.11.2010 passed by the respondent Collector, Jehanabad in Case No. 14/D.M./2010, contained in Annexure-6, as also the order contained in Memo No. 469 dated 18.01.2009 passed by the District Programme Officer, Jehanabad by which the engagement of the petitioner as Anganwadi Sevika has been dispensed with/terminated on certain allegations of committing irregularities in the matter of running of the Anganwadi Centre.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has assailed the order of removal/termination of this petitioner mainly on the ground that while passing the impugned order the District Programme Officer has not at all considered the show cause submitted by the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that even though the District Programme Officer has recorded his dissatisfaction on the show cause submitted by this petitioner but the order passed by him nowhere indicates the consideration given by him to the submissions made by the petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that from perusal of Annexure-3 it would appear that in the show cause noti