SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Pat) 331

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
RAJENDRA MENON, RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD, JJ.
Cosmos Beverages Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar and Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 421 of 2018
Decided On : 27-03-2018

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Manish Kumar Singh, Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Singh

Headnote:

(A) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 – Section 58(2) – Confiscation of Truck carrying liquor – Copy of transport pass for transport of duty free or duty paid packaged foreign liquor and Lorry Challan showing vehicle number are all genuine documents – If Invoice has mentioned Export and Import permit numbers and Invoice has been found to be correct, confiscation of goods and vehicle only for not carrying valid excise import and export pass even though petitioners were carrying transport pass along with consignment cannot be said to be proper exercise of power by Collector-cum-District Magistrate – Materials which have been seized and confiscated are concerned, those are very much covered under Invoice and transport pass and in case any short fall has been found in quantity mentioned in Invoice and that of seizure list, same may be a matter to be considered separately to find out whether short fall has occasioned due to any criminal intent – It is a case where quantity loaded on Truck was a little less than quantity mentioned in Invoice – It cannot be said that liquor were being unlawfully transported or sold – Besides, vehicle plying on National Highway en route to West Bengal via territories of State of Bihar was required to be digitally locked and that facility was available at Check Post – It was for concerned authorities of State of Bihar to provide digital lock otherwise in absence of any prima facie proof of fact that petitioners had entered in any illegal transaction of sale of liquor inside State territory vehicle and entire consignment in question cannot be allowed to be confiscated – Impugned orders set aside – Respondents directed to release truck as well as liquor which was subject matter of confiscation. (Paras 9, 11, 12, 13 and 15)

(B) Constitution of India – Article 226 – Writ proceeding – Alternative remedy – Principle of alternative remedy is a rule of convenience and not a rule of law – In an appropriate case, High Court in exercise of its’ extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution of India may be inclined to entertain a writ application without relegating petitioners back to statutory remedy. (Para 14)

JUDGMENT :

RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD, J.

The writ petitioners have moved this Court in its extraordinary writ jurisdiction for setting aside the order dated 22.11.2017 passed by the Excise Commissioner, Bihar Patna. By the impugned order, the Excise Commissioner, Bihar has rejected the appeal preferred by the petitioners for release of 550 Cartoons (4842.00 liters) of Mac Dowell No.1 whisky as per seizure list dated 6.5.2016 with the Truck bearing number WB-51A/7310 which has been confiscated under Section 58(2) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 and thereby he refused to interfere with the confiscation order passed by the Collector in Excise Case No. 08/2016-17.

2. Petitioner no.1 is a private limited company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and is the manufacturer of the whisky seized on 6.5.2016 by Sub Inspector of Excise, Kishanganj. Petitioner no.2 is the Authorized Carrier having its office in the State of West Bengal at Kolkata. It is the common case of the petitioners that while the Goods were being carried to its destination at Kolkata from Siliguri on Truck No. WB-51A/7310, the same was intercepted around Farig Gola Check Post (Kishanganj) by Sub Inspector, Excise and a seizure list was prepared which detailed the goods and the documents along with Truck seized on 6.5.2016. They have specifically stated that this is the only route to Kolkata via NH 37.

3. A copy of the report along with seizure list have been brought on record by way of Annexure-2 series to the present writ application. The petitioners claim that the documents seized and mentioned in the seizure list would show that the exclusive possession and ownership of the petitioners are not in dispute and further that the petitioners were in possession of goods with valid and bona-fide as also proper documents and all the applicable taxes have been paid thereon. Copy of the consignment note bearing details including from destination and invoice No. with date has been enclosed as Annexure-3 to the writ petition. The petitioners have also placed on record that the Lorry Challan having entire description including name of driver, his PAN No., quality of wine and other details were very much available and filed before the Collector, Kishanganj for purpose of release of the goods seized.

4. The petitioners have brought on record (Annexure-5 to the writ petition), which is a report of the Excise Department, Government of West Bengal stating that “ there is no doubt regarding the genuineness of the consignment of 550 cases of Foreign liquor which was issued from Cosmos Beverages Pvt. Ltd., FL Trade (Consignor), Eastern Bye Pass Road, Thakur Nagar, P.O.: Sahudangi Haat, District-Jalpaiguri, Pin – 735135 and was en-route to Essbee Intech Pvt. Ltd., FL Trade (Consignee), 15 Canal East Road, Kolkata (North), Pin-700067 under the cover of Transport Pass no: FLDT/2016-2017/00081074 dated 5.5.2016 in vehicle bearing registration no.WB51A-7310 and the validity of the consignment was for 72 hours i.e. 8.5.2016 up to 4.40 P.M.”

5. Learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that the impugned order by which the Collector-Cum-District Magistrate, Kishanganj has confiscated the vehicle and the Articles seized as also the order by which the Excise Commissioner, Bihar has rejected the appeal preferred by the petitioners against the order of confiscation are wholly illegal, arbitrary and bad in law.

6. Pointing out the infirmities in the impugned order passed by the Excise Commissioner, learned counsel submits that the finding of the Commissioner that the appellants did not comply with the requirement of digital locking system has no basis to stand. It is his contention that if the digital locking facility was available at the Farig Gola Check Post and it was a requirement provided for the vehicle passing through the National Highway en route to West Bengal via the territories of the State of Bihar it was for the authorities concerned and competent on



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top