SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Pat) 899

PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD – Appellant
Versus
ARHULA DEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Raj Kumar Singh Vikram, Manoj Kumar Jha, Vishwaroop Jha, Advs.

JUDGMENT :

Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 to 3 on this miscellaneous appeal.

2. This miscellaneous appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 10.02.2012 and award dated 13.09.2012 passed by the learned 1st Additional District Judge-cum-Motor Vehicles Accident Claim Tribunal, Madhubani (hereinafter in short referred to as the 'Tribunal') in Claim Case No.02 of 2004, whereby the learned Tribunal allowing the claim case directed the opposite party no.4-National Insurance Company Limited (hereinafter in short referred to as the 'Insurance Company') to make payment of compensation to the tune of Rs. 2,71,500/- to the claimants within two months from the date of order, failing which the total amount should be recoverable under process of law along with the interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the claim case till its realization.

3. The factual matrix of the case is that claimants filed Claim Case No.02 of 2004 under Section 166 of the M.V. Act for awarding compensation on account of death of Sarwan Kumar Sah @ Shakti Singh with the case in succinct that on 23.07.2003. S








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top