SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Pat) 35

AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Binod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jagnnath Singh, Adv., Atul Chandra, Adv., Jharkhandi Upadhyay, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 6053 of 2013 has moved the Court for the following relief:

"That this criminal Miscellaneous application is for quashing the order dated 13.11.2009 passed by Sr. Dasrath Mishra, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna in Complaint case no. 2776 (C)/2006 rejecting the petition dated 7.10.2009 filed for discharge of the petitioner."

3. The petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 6054 of 2013 has moved the Court for the following relief:

"That this criminal Miscellaneous application is for quashing the order dated 5.9.2009 passed by Sr. Dasrath Mishra, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna in Complaint case no. 2776 (C)/2006 rejecting the petition dated 11.08.2009 filed for discharge of the petitioner."

4. Despite service of notice, nobody appeared on behalf of the Opposite Party No. 2, when the case was taken up and heard.

5. The allegation against the petitioners is that they being Directors of Magadh Coloniser Private Limited, which is a Company had neither given the flat booked in the name of the wife of the complainant nor returned the en
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top