IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
AMRESHWAR PRATAP SAHI, ANJANA MISHRA, JJ.
The State of Bihar - Appellants
Versus
Sawalia Rai, S/O Shri Kallu Rai - Respondent
Letters Patent Appeal No.1068 of 2017
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15375 of 2010
Decided On : 14-12-2018
Service Law – Reinstatement – On post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra – Alleged irregularity in selection – Petitioners have been reinstated on their respective posts with full back-wages – There are two reports which clearly indicate that petitioners in writ applications were guilty of having secured employment as Panchayat Shiksha Mitra by using forged and fabricated documents – Reports clearly demonstrate that their appointments were based on such fraud – As such, very basis of their selections being made on false and fabricated documents their appointments become void ab initio – Any subsequent benefit which had accrued to them could not be perpetuated as fraud goes to root and vitiates everything of matter – Clear illegality committed in matter of appointment of respondents and repeated reports of authorities which were submitted in pursuance of enquiry set up by High Court in a previous litigation, cannot be overlooked – Order of Single Judge set aside – Appeal allowed. (Paras 20 to 25)
ANJANA MISHRA, J.
Re.: I.A. No. 5408 of 2017
1. The present application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been filed for condoning the delay in filing the appeal.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the delay in filing the appeal may be condoned as after the order dated 29.11.2016 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 15375 of 2010 came to the knowledge of the authorities necessary steps were taken for filing the appeal and after due scrutiny the decision was taken to prefer an appeal against the aforesaid order.
3. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant, there are adequate grounds for condoning the delay as sufficient cause has been made out by the appellants for explaining the delay in filing the appeal. As such, the delay in filing the appeal stands condoned.
4. The interlocutory application (I.A. No. 5408 of 2017) is, accordingly, disposed of.
Re.: L.P.A. No. 1068 of 2017
5. This intra court appeal has been preferred by the State of Bihar and its authorities against the order dated 29.11.2016 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 15375 of 2010 by which a Bench of this Court has allowed the writ petition filed by the first respondents and the order passed by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Siwan dated 14.08.2010 in Case No. 125 of 2010 has been quashed and the petitioners therein have been reinstated on their respective posts of Panchayat Teachers with all consequential benefits.
6. It was submitted that in the year 2002, a scheme for engagement of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra was commenced with a stipulation that the Shiksha Mitras should continue for a period of 11 months. As such, engagements were to be made on contractual basis and the guidelines for such engagements were contained in Resolution No. 1079 dated 20.06.2002 issued under the signature of the Secretary, Primary and Adult Education Department (Annexure-7 to writ petition).
7. Consequently, the Secretary, Primary and Adult Education Department, vide Memo No. 336 dated 21.06.2002 issued certain guidelines for implementation of the aforementioned resolution fixing the requisite qualifications in which the minimum educational qualification was to be matriculate or equivalent with 45% marks and further that the candidate had to be of that very Panchayat.
8. In the year 2004, the Secretary, Primary and Adult Education Department, Bihar, Patna issued a further Memo No. 1458 on 11.08.2004 with regard to the selection of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra whereby the minimum educational qualification were enhanced to Intermediate with certain relaxation to lady candidates (Annexure-8 to the writ petition).
9. In pursuance of such scheme and in view of such guidelines for selection of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra, a Aam Sabha (General Meeting) was called for at Gram Panchayat Raj Mahammadpur, Block-Bhagwanpur Hat, District-Siwan wherein a decision was taken by them in which Mukhiya was presiding over the Sukh Suvidha Samiti. The President of the School Education Committee as well as the Headmaster of the concerned school took a conscious decision of selecting and preparing a merit-list of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra. A merit-list of 11 candidates in the female category and 10 under the male category, found to be eligible was prepared in which the names of the writ petitioners appeared at Serial No. 5 and 6 respectively in the male category. As such, vide Memo No. 4 dated 08.05.2005 issued under the signature of the Mukhiya. The petitioners/respondent 1st set came to be selected in which the name of petitioner No. 1 was at Serial No. 17 and that of petitioner No. 2 at Serial No. 16 (Annexure-10 to the writ petition).
10. Accordingly, the petitioner No. 1 joined in Government Primary School, Beera Bankat, Anchal- Bhagwanpur Hat, District-Siwan and the petitioner No. 2 joined in Government Kanya Middle School, Mahammadpur, Anchal- Bhagwanpur Hat, District-Siwan, and they began to discharge their duties and continued to do so and further they were granted a second term of 11 mo
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu V. Jagannath & Ors. reported in 1994 (1) SCC 1
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.