S. KUMAR
Meena Pratap Wife of late Bhanu Pratap – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar Through Principal Secretary – Respondent
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. This application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for quashing the order dated 19.03.2013 passed by the Secretary (Disciplinary Authority), Bihar Public Service Commission, dismissing petitioner from service as well as order dated 14.11.2013 passed by Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission (Appellate Authority).
3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case is that petitioner was appointed on the post of Analyst Programmer in the office of Bihar Public Service Commission. Allegations were made about various acts of irregularities in respect of Bihar Administrative Service, 1st Limited Competitive Examination- 2003. Various writ petitions were filed in Patna High Court leading to cancellation of said examination and also institution of Vigilance Case No. 19/2005, 10/2006 and 20/2006 in which 29 persons including petitioner were arrested. Documents, answer-sheets, computers and other articles relating to said examination were seized and charge-sheet was submitted against 109 persons including the petitioner.
4. Petitioner was an Analyst Programmer in BPSC and was arrested on 29.12.2005 and he was suspended vi
Ravindra Nath Singh vs. Bihar State Road Transport Corporation
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.