SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Pat) 448

ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
Manoj Kumar Bansal – Appellant
Versus
Bihar State Housing Board – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Mr. Alok Kumar Agrawal, Mrs. Priya Gupta.
For the Respondent: Mr. Ansuman Singh.

JUDGMENT :

ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY, J.

1. Heard Mr. S.D. Sanjay, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Ansuman Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Housing Board.

2. The petitioner has filed the present application for quashing of the letter dated 27.11.2013 issued by the Revenue Officer, Bihar State Housing Board, by which the respondent threatened cancellation of allotment for non-payment of demand raised in lieu of interest to the tune of Rs. 1,54,58,129.70/-.

3. The original price of the plot was Rs. 9 lacs in auction purchase. The auction was held on 04.02.1984 on higher purchase basis for a period of 66 years.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present case is a telling tale of taking advantage of total inaction and incompetence of the Housing Board and penalizing the allottee/petitioner for the admitted inaction on behalf of the Housing Board. He has drawn the attention of the Court to various letters issued and enclosed with the writ application. Mr. Sanjay, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top