SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Pat) 524

ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI
Sudama Sai – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan.
For the Respondent: Mr. S.A. Ahmad.

JUDGMENT :

ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI, J.

1. Appellant, Sudama Sai has been found guilty for an offence punishable under Section 366A of the IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for five years as well as to pay fine appertaining to Rs. 5000/- in default thereof, to undergo R.I. for six months, additionally, under Section 376(C) IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for five years as well as to pay fine appertaining to Rs. 5000/- in default thereof to undergo R.I. for six months, additionally, under Section 4 of the POCSO Act and sentenced to undergo R.I. for seven years as well as to pay fine appertaining to Rs. 5000/- in default thereof, to undergo R.I. for six months, with a further direction to run the sentences concurrently by the judgment of conviction dated 03.12.2015 order of sentence dated 09.12.2015 passed by First Additional Sessions Judge-cum Special Judge, POCSO Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Trial No. 2/2014 arising out of Chainpur P.S. Case No. 183/2013.

2. Kabutari Devi (PW-1) filed written report on 08.12.2013 disclosing therein that at an earlier occasion there was religious congregation and in order to facilitate the same, they have invited Sudama Sai. During course thereof

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top