MADHURESH PRASAD
Prakash Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Madhuresh Prasad, J.
The writ petitioners in these batch of writ petitions have approached this Court being aggrieved by rejection of their candidature in the selection process conducted by the respondent Bihar Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as 'the Commission). 64th Bihar Combined Competitive Examination conducted by the respondent Commission is in issue in the instant proceedings, for which advertisement was issued on 02.08.2018 for filling up total 1465 vacancies in different posts under the Government of Bihar.
2. The brief facts giving rise to the instant writ proceedings is that the petitioners applied for consideration in the process of selection. Altogether there were 4,71,145 applicants. The process of selection comprised of an objective preliminary examination comprising of 150 multiple choice questions carrying one mark each. Successful candidates to the tune of ten times the number of vacancies were to be selected on the basis of objective preliminary examination for writing the mains subjective examination.
3. The Commission for the purpose of evaluation had got prepared a model answer key by the question setters. After the preliminary examin
High Court of Tripura Vs. Tirtha Sarathi Mukherjee
Ran Vijay Singh & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.
Rajesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar
Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Mukesh Thakur & Anr.
U.P. Public Service Commission Vs. Rahul Singh
Anshu Ranjan Vs. State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary & Ors.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.