Back
AMRESHWAR PRATAP SAHI, ANJANA MISHRA
Arif Raza S/o Late Md. Mohsin – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
AMRESHWAR PRATAP SAHI, J.
1. The Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna has declined to quash the order passed by the respondent Railways dated 27th May, 2011 whereby the request of the petitioner to withdraw his resignation has not been accepted.
2. The petitioner being an ex-serviceman having worked for the Indian Air Force for 15 years was re-employed in the Railways as a Section Engineer.
3. The petitioner’s political ambitions allured him to test his fate by contesting the Bihar Assembly Elections of 2010 for which he tendered his resignation on 28th September, 2010 before the Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway, Danapur. The purpose of resignation was clearly intended to contest the Assembly Elections from Hasanpur Constituency of District-Samastipur in Bihar. The resignation was accepted with effect from 29th September, 2010. The petitioner contested the elections and lost the same. The resignation, according to its terms, became effective and it is on 26th of November, 2010, almost one month after the acceptance of the resignation, that the petitioner moved his request for withdrawing his resignation.
4. The said request was declined on 27th of May, 2011.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
