IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, Anjana Mishra, Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, JJ.
Ramashankar Patel - Appellant
Vs.
State Of Bihar - Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11255 of 2016, 3828 of 2015
Decided On : 22-08-2019
Bihar Elementary School Teachers Promotion Rule, 2011 – Rules 4(2) and 7(2) – Promotion to B.A. Trained Scale – Educational qualification – Petitioners have degree of Sahityalankar from Hindi Vidyapeeth, Deoghar which is claimed to be equivalent to graduate degree – Non-recognition of degree – Petitioners were appointed as Assistant Teachers against Matric Trained Posts – In terms of notification of the General Administration Department as contained in Memo No. 541 dated 11th January, 1991, Sahityalankar certificate had got equivalence to graduation at least prior to 25.08.2008 – Those writ petitioners who obtained their Sahityalankar degree from Hindi Vidyapeeth, Deoghar prior to 25.08.2008 would come within framework of notification dated 11th January, 1991 and shall be entitled for consideration for promotion to B.A. (Trained) Scale – By virtue of notification dated 08.04.2016, promotions granted between 07.05.2012 and 08.04.2016 have been saved – By notification dated 17.04.2017 now even degree obtained prior to 07.05.2012 and appointment/promotion granted between 07.05.2012 and 08.04.2016 have been saved – In these circumstances concerned petitioners shall also be entitled for benefits because in both cases i.e. notification dated 08.04.2016 and notification dated 17.04.2017 State respondents cannot contend that while promotions granted to persons junior to petitioners in gradation list between 07.05.2012 and 08.04.2016 shall be saved, petitioners would not be entitled for the same – This would be discriminatory because once equivalence granted to Sahityalankar degree obtained from Hindi Vidyapeeth, Deoghar prior to 07.05.2012 is saved it will save petitioners who have their Sahityalankar degree obtained prior to 07.05.2012 – They would be entitled to maintain their position in seniority list – In case juniors to them have been granted promotion in terms of B.A. (Trained) Scale, these petitioners shall also be entitled for the same from the date their juniors have received the benefit – Respondent authorities directed to consider case of petitioners and grant them same benefits with effect from date benefits have been granted to juniors to petitioners. (Paras 44 and 46)
Cases Referred:
Ramnath Prasad Singh vs. State of Bihar, 2009 (3) PLJR 384; Dr. Amaresh Thakur vs. State of Bihar, L.P.A. No. 11 of 2014; Ganesh Prasad Singh vs. State of Bihar, L.P.A. No. 1027 of 2014; Reeta Srivastava vs. State of Bihar, 2012 (3) PLJR 353; Sanjay Kumar vs. State of Bihar, 2009 (4) PLJR 1038; State of Bihar vs. Mamta Kumari, 2010 (4) PLJR 318; State of Rajasthan vs Lata Arun, (2002) 6 SCC 202; State of Bihar vs. Poonam Sharma, 2009 (3) PLJR 84; Poonam Sharma vs. State of Bihar, 2012 (1) PLJR 226; Surendra Prasad Sahi vs. State of Bihar, decided on 4th December, 2009 in L.P.A. No. 654 of 2009; Ganesh Prasad Srivastav vs.Punjab National Bank, 2004(1) PLJR 387; Binod Kumar vs. State of Bihar, (L.P.A. No. 460 of 2014 decided on 19.08.2016) – Referred.
JUDGMENT :
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.
These two writ applications have been placed before this Full Bench to resolve the issues raised by the learned Single Judge in his order dated 20.03.2017 passed in C.W.J.C,. No. 11255 of 2016. In order to appreciate the reference, we think it just and proper to re-produce the order dated 20.03.2017 as under :
The petitioners have moved the Court being aggrieved by non-consideration of their case for promotion to B.A. Trained Scale. The petitioners have the degree of Sahitya Alankar from Hindi Vidyapeeth, Deogarh which is claimed to be equivalent to graduate degree. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that being equivalent, such degree has to be recognized for the purposes of promotion also, since based on such degree, they havegot post graduate degree from Nalanda Open University which is the University of the State Government. Learned counsel has also drawn the attention of the Court to the circular of the Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department dated 11.01.1991 by which Sahitya Alankar from Hindi Vidyapeeth, Deogarh has been made at par with B.A. degree with the rider that it should be with English. Learned counsel submitted that even a Division Bench of this Court in L.P.A. No. 11 of 2014 (Dr. Amresh Thakur Vs. The State of Bihar and Ors.) dated 27.01.2016 as well as L.P.A. No. 460 of 2014 (Binod Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar and Ors.) dated 19.08.2016 has held that a person having Sahitya Alankar degree on the basis of which he had achieved higher qualification, shall be considered for the purpose of giving promotion to B.A./Graduate Trained Scale. Learned counsel also referred to a coordinate Bench judgment dated 03.05.2016 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 4401 of 2013 (Chandra Bhushan Pd. Singh and Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar and Ors.) for the same proposition.
Learned counsel for the State submitted that all the orders passed, including that by the Division Benches, have not taken into consideration the earlier order passed by a Division Bench in C.W.J.C. No. 13836 of 2012 (Murlidhar Singh and Ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and Ors.) dated 27.11.2012, where it has been held that for the purposes of employment or promotion the qualification of Sahitya Alankar from Hindi Vidyapeeth, Deogarh cannot be taken into consideration. Learned counsel submitted that the said view was also expressed by this Court in earlier decisions of this Court in the cases of State of Bihar vs. Mamta Kumari, (2010) 4 PLJR 318 and Poonam Sharma vs. State of Bihar, (2012) 1 PLJR 226. It was submitted that the Court in the said decision has referred to various articles of the Bihar Education Code as well as provisions of the Bihar Taken Over Elementary School Teachers' Promotion Rules, 1993, which subsequent judgments have not considered.
In view of the aforesaid, in the opinion of this Court, the subsequent judgments of this Court relied upon by learned counsel for the petitioners, having not considered/noticed the earlier Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Murlidhar Singh and Ors. (supra), and also taking into account the fact that subsequently the Government has also clarified the situation by categorically holding that Sahitya Alankar from Hindi Vidyapeeth, Deogarh shall not be recognized as equivalent to graduate degree in Notification No. 5267 dated 08.04.2016 of the General Administration Department, the matter is referred to a Larger Bench for considering the issue.
Accordingly, the matter be placed before Hon'ble the Chief Justice for being heard by a Full Bench."
2. The petitioners in these cases were appointed as Assistant Teachers against Matric Trained Posts and were posted in different elementary schools in the District of Begusarai. They had obtained their certificate of Sahityaalankar from Hindi Vidyapeeth, Deohgar that
Ganesh Prasad Srivastav & Ors. Vs. Punjab National Bank & Ors.
Poonam Sharma Vs. State of Bihar
Ramnath Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar
Reeta Srivastava Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors
Sanjay Kumar & Or. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.