IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
S. Kumar, J.
Shri Shitala Mata Mandir - Appellant
Versus
Bihar State Religious Trust Board - Respondent
Miscellaneous Appeal No. 472 of 2014, 560 of 2014
Decided On : 23-06-2020
Bihar Hindu Religious Trusts Act, 1950 – Section 32(3) – Temple of Shri Sheetla Mata – Constitution of Committee – Court below after considering and appreciating several documents placed before it found the temple to be public religious trusts and Board of Religious Trust has right to supervise the administration of such Trusts (Temple) and can take necessary steps under provisions of Act for its proper management and dismissed both miscellaneous cases being devoid of any merit – There is no irregularity, error or infirmity in order passed by court below – Appeals dismissed. (Paras 16 and 18)
JUDGMENT
S Kumar, J. - Heard the parties.
2. These miscellaneous appeals have been filed for setting aside the judgment and order dated 3.7.2014 passed in Miscellaneous case No. 86 of 2012 and Miscellaneous Case No.12 of 2007 passed by learned District Judge, Patna dismissing the miscellaneous cases filed by appellants under Section 32(3) of Bihar Hindu Religious Trusts Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act".
3. According to appellants, Temple of Shri Sheetla Mata is situated from time immemorial and since time immemorial worship and management of temple is being performed by family members privately and individually over plot nos.533, 534, 537, Khata No.121 comprising an area of 13 kathas 9 dhurs and 5 dhurkies in Agamkuan, Patna and over plot no. 534, measuring 3 kathas, 6 durs, 7 dhurki Sheetla Mata Mandir is situated.
4. On 16th February, 1911, cadastral survey was finally published and name of Chamru Lal Bhagat, ancestor of appellants was entered in the khatiyan as Shebait. In the year 1933, Chamaru Lal Bhagat died and his sons became Shebait and in the year 1947 Lal Babu Mali and Bangali Mali became Shebait of the Temple.
5. Temple in question is private temple and has never been vested in Religious Trust Board and all the time, Shebaitship was inherited by the heirs of late Chamru Lal Bhagat, however, Temple was opened for public in 1947 when chicken pox spread and patients were treated by appellants' family by applying water of the well and leaf of Neam tree standing in the compound.
6. Bihar State Board of Religious Trust issued notification dated 1.7.2006 vide memo no.1739 dated 3.7.2006 whereby a scheme for better management of Shri Sheetla Mata Mandir, Agamkuan, Patna was notified in exercise of power conferred under Section 32(1) of the Act and said notification was challenged by the appellants under Section 32 (3) of the said Act before the District Judge, Patna giving rise to two miscellaneous cases as referred above.
7. It was stated by the appellants in their application that two full brother Lal Babu Pujari and Bengali Pujari, sons of late Ram Kishun Mali are Shebaits of Shri Sheetla Mata Mandir and as such are persons interested in the management and affair of temple and are entitled to invoke the jurisdiction under Section 32 (3) of the said Act.
8. Lal Babu Pujari filed miscellaneous case No.12/2007 whereas another brother Bengali Pujari filed Miscellaneous Case No.86/2012 under Section 32 (3) of the Act challenging the aforesaid notification issued by the Administrator -cum-OSD of Religious Trust Board before the District Judge, Patna against the same order.
9. Two issues were framed and decided by the court below ,i..e. (i) Whether the committee has been properly constituted? (ii) Whether Shri Sheetla Mata Mandir is a public trust?
10. As far as first issue is concerned, challenge to the notification dated 1.7.2016 whereby a scheme had been framed for proper administration of Shri Sheetla Mata Mandir, Agamkuan, Patna as well as constitution of 11-Member committee for its proper management as per scheme framed is concerned, two miscellaneous cases were filed, however, during pendency of miscellaneous case, the Board dissolved said Committee by the order dated 24.6.2009 under Section 29 (2) of the Act and a fresh committee was constituted as such first issue became infructuous. Moreover, appellants had not made members of Committee as party respondents in proceeding as such their petition was also bad for non-joinder of necessary party and on said ground itself, miscellaneous cases were fit to be rejected.
11. As far as second issue is concerned, whether Shri Sheetla Mata Mandir, Agamkuan, Patna is private temple or public temple, it is gathered from the materials available on record that Shri Sheetla Mata Mandir, Agamkuan, Patna is situated over C.S. Plot No.534 which is recorded in cadastral survey khatiyan as gairmajarua aam land which indicates nature of temple to be a public temple.
12. In C.S
SupremeToday
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.