SANJAY KAROL, ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
Manish Kumar Chaudhary, Son of Subodh Kumar Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Government of Bihar, Patna – Respondent
ORDER :
Sanjay Karol, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents.
2. The petitioner prays for setting aside the order dated 09.12.2016 passed by the District Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in Confiscation Case No. 55 of 2016 whereby vehicle, namely, Swift Desire, bearing Registration No. BR-01CW 2912 has been confiscated and further direction to the respondents to release the vehicle seized in connection with Mejaganj P.S. Case No. 183 of 2016 for the offences punishable under Sections 47(A) and 55(B) of the Bihar Excise Act.
3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition stands disposed of in the following terms.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner shall be content if directions are issued to the following effect:- (a) Interim order for release of the property (vehicle/house/land/shop etc.) be allowed to be continued to be in operation till such time the proceedings envisaged under the provision of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 are not concluded; (b) petitioner shall fully cooperate in all such proceedings contemplated under the said Act and not take any unnecessary adjournment; (c) also if the proceedings fo
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.