MADHURESH PRASAD
Ozair Alam and Ors Son of Late Habibur Rahman – Appellant
Versus
Food Corporation Of India through the Chairman cum Managing Director and Ors through the Chairman Cum Managing Director – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation.
2. In respect of some irregularities at the godowns of the respondent Food Corporation of India, the petitioners were proceeded against. The charges were in respect of ill maintenance of the godown of the Corporation. Non maintenance of stock register and non maintenance of documents showing receipt of food grains at the godown was also alleged.
3. Petitioners 1 and 2 were exonerated in the proceedings conducted against them. Petitioner No. 3 was awarded a minor punishment of censure by order dated 07.03.2014 of the Disciplinary Authority. Petitioners 1 and 2 are Assistant Grade II category (hereinafter referred to as Cat II) whereas petitioner No. 3 was in Cat III of the respondent Corporation. The writ petition has been filed since the order passed in the departmental proceeding on 7.3.2014 by the General Manager (Region) of the FCI has been reviewed by a decision dated 4.1.2019 passed by the Executive Director (East) FCI (respondent No. 3). Power of review has been exercised under Regulation 74 of the Food Corporation of India (Staff) Regulation 1971. It is this
Ibrahimpatnam Taluk Vyavasaya Coolie Sangham vs. K. Suresh Reddy reported in 2003 (7) SCC 667
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.