Back
ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
Ram Nath Singh S/o Late Ambika Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
2. Petitioners have filed present writ application for quashing the order dated 17.08.2016 which was passed by the Principal Secretary rejecting the claim of the petitioner for grant of promotion in the selection. The benefit of selection period was earlier available to 20% of the cadre later on the respondents have decided on 04.03.2014 to grant the benefit of all teachers on completion of Kalawadhi.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners submits that the action of the respondents in adopting two different yards is violative of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. The benefit of up gradation was extended to the teachers to do away stagnation, earlier the scheme of time bound promotion was in place but time bound scheme ceased w.e.f. 31.12.1995. The respondents have taken decision to introduce Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACP) which was subsequently modified as Modified Assured Career Progression. Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme was introduced in 2010 which was extended to the teachers having regard to the lack of opportunity of financial up
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
