ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
Mithilesh Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
ORAL JUDGMENT
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the respondents.
2. Considering the fact that all the writ petitions involve the same question of fact and law, with the consent of the parties, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
3. The present batch of writ petitions involve issue of appointment of 129 non-teaching employees on different posts and their regularization after scrutiny by 3-men Committee Constituted by the University. After regularization, the State step in and started scrutiny with regard to legality and validity of the initial appointment of the petitioners. Finally the State Constituted a 3-men Committee to examine the legality and validity of appointment of 129 non-teaching staff working in different constituent units of Veer Kunwar Singh University.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that all the petitioners were appointed in the constituent colleges initially under Magadh University but later on after bifurcation, the colleges in question became the constituent units of Veer Kunwar Singh University. The contention of the petitioners in the present batch of writ petitions is that they h
Braj Kishore Singh v. State of Bihar 1997 (1) BLJR 652 : 1997 (1) P.L.J.R. 509
Ramsevak Yadav Vs. the Stae of Bihar reported in 2013 (1) PLJR 962
State of Bihar Vs. Sunny Prakash: (2013) 3 SCC 559
Amarkant Rai vs State of Bihar & Ors. reported in (2015) 8 SCC 265
Nald Lal Bhagat Vs. The State of Bihar
Purtabpur Sugar Mill Vs. Cane Commissioner: AIR 1970 SC 1896
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.