JUDGMENT

Ashutosh Kumar, J. - Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Singh and Mr. Sandip Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Awadhesh Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The petitioners had approached this Court initially as no decision was being taken by the Vice Chancellor of the Arayabhatta Knowledge University on the representations preferred by them for re-evaluation / retotaling of their answer sheets.

3. During the pendency of the writ petition and after first hearing before this Court, the petitioners were intimated that their answer-sheets had been sent for reevaluation / re-totaling before the grievance committee, constituted for the purpose and based on that report, which indicated that there was no need for any interference with the marks allotted to the petitioners, the Vice Chancellor rejected the contention of the petitioners that interference in the assessment was required.

4. The aforesaid order of the Vice Chancellor dated 15.09.2020 is under challenge.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners have taken great pains to demonstrate before this Court that there was no proper assessment of their answer-sheets and almost all the petitioners, who have had brilliant a